<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Family Legacy Blog | Southwest Florida | Fort Myers | Estate and Trust Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>Estate Planning information presented in understandable family themes</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on When the Feds Come Marching In by Another Bank Bites The Dust - Actually Two &#124; The Wealth Wave Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/archives/estate-planning/27#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Bank Bites The Dust - Actually Two &#124; The Wealth Wave Movement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/?p=27#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] When the Feds Come Marching In - This is generally good news for the shareholders of the acquiring bank and bad news for the shareholders (and management) of the failed bank. Over the past weekend, two banks operating in the western United States, First National Bank &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When the Feds Come Marching In - This is generally good news for the shareholders of the acquiring bank and bad news for the shareholders (and management) of the failed bank. Over the past weekend, two banks operating in the western United States, First National Bank &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joint Ownership by Craig R. Hersch</title>
		<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/archives/estate-planning/20#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig R. Hersch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/?p=20#comment-72</guid>
		<description>In your scenario you describe a transfer of real estate that is currently owned jointly with rights of survivorship to a third party who is not one of the two joint owners. Unless both owners sign the deed, at least in Florida you have an invalid transfer. Both joint owners must sign the deed.

Now let me address a transfer signed by the parties that are necessary. Here, a deathbed quit claim is certainly legal but not prudent from a tax standpoint. 

When one gifts assets during lifetime the beneficiary receives the asset at the grantor's tax cost basis. Contrast this result to the situation where the beneficiary inherits the assets after death, when she receives a step up in tax cost basis equal to fair market value as of the date of death. This step up in tax cost basis at death, often reduces or eliminates the capital gain tax consequence. In your example above, a joint owner would receive a step-up in one half of the value of the home as of the date of death of the joint life owner. 

Since a lifetime gift is a transfer possibly subject to gift tax, then there is no transfer tax advantage for a deathbed transfer. Therefore, the deathbed transfer often doesn't make sense from a capital gains tax standpoint, although competent tax counsel should be consulted in any situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your scenario you describe a transfer of real estate that is currently owned jointly with rights of survivorship to a third party who is not one of the two joint owners. Unless both owners sign the deed, at least in Florida you have an invalid transfer. Both joint owners must sign the deed.</p>
<p>Now let me address a transfer signed by the parties that are necessary. Here, a deathbed quit claim is certainly legal but not prudent from a tax standpoint. </p>
<p>When one gifts assets during lifetime the beneficiary receives the asset at the grantor&#8217;s tax cost basis. Contrast this result to the situation where the beneficiary inherits the assets after death, when she receives a step up in tax cost basis equal to fair market value as of the date of death. This step up in tax cost basis at death, often reduces or eliminates the capital gain tax consequence. In your example above, a joint owner would receive a step-up in one half of the value of the home as of the date of death of the joint life owner. </p>
<p>Since a lifetime gift is a transfer possibly subject to gift tax, then there is no transfer tax advantage for a deathbed transfer. Therefore, the deathbed transfer often doesn&#8217;t make sense from a capital gains tax standpoint, although competent tax counsel should be consulted in any situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joint Ownership by Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/archives/estate-planning/20#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/?p=20#comment-71</guid>
		<description>If two people who live together but not married own a home jointly with right of survivorship. Can one person on his deathbed quit claim his half to someone other than who he owned the home with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If two people who live together but not married own a home jointly with right of survivorship. Can one person on his deathbed quit claim his half to someone other than who he owned the home with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joint Ownership by Craig R. Hersch</title>
		<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/archives/estate-planning/20#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig R. Hersch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/?p=20#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I have not seen a Ladybird will in Florida. About the closest item to this would be a transfer wherein the grantor retains a life estate and transfers the remainder interest to others. Gift tax issues apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen a Ladybird will in Florida. About the closest item to this would be a transfer wherein the grantor retains a life estate and transfers the remainder interest to others. Gift tax issues apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joint Ownership by George  Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/archives/estate-planning/20#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>George  Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbshlaw.com/blog/?p=20#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I've heard of something called a "ladybird" will. It allows an asset,like a house, to be given at death but the person that inherits it had no ownership in the property prior to the death of the owner. This is legal in texas. Does florida have a similar law??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of something called a &#8220;ladybird&#8221; will. It allows an asset,like a house, to be given at death but the person that inherits it had no ownership in the property prior to the death of the owner. This is legal in texas. Does florida have a similar law??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
